> ## Content Index
> Fetch the complete content index at: https://pvweekly.com/llms.txt
> Use this file to discover other available public pages before exploring further.

# GE’s final split put aircraft engines and the power grid in separate companies
- URL: https://pvweekly.com/ge-aerospace-vernova-separation-industrial-services/
- Published: 2026-10-27T19:29:56.000Z
- Updated: 2026-10-27T19:29:56.000Z
- Description: 2024 archive · The April 2024 separation created two independently listed industrial businesses with large installed fleets—and years of service work attached to them.
- Author: PV Weekly Editorial
- Tags: Grids & markets, Archive 2024, #ledger-format, #archive-backfill-20261027

**2024 archive** · April 2, 2024Reporting prepared October 22, 2026\. This retrospective describes events and expectations from the period covered.[Browse the archive](https://pvweekly.com/archive/)

An aircraft engine and a power-station turbine could both carry the GE name after April 2, 2024\. They no longer sat inside the same diversified public company. GE completed the spin-off of its energy businesses as GE Vernova, leaving GE Aerospace focused on aviation propulsion, systems and services.

The transaction was the final step in a separation that also produced an independent GE HealthCare. GE Aerospace continued trading under the GE ticker, while Vernova began trading as GEV. Eligible GE shareholders received one Vernova share for every four GE shares held.

For the industrial economy, the consequential division was the equipment and work placed on each side. Neither company began life waiting for its first factory order. Both inherited substantial fleets of machines already operating for customers, alongside the manufacturing capacity and expertise needed to supply and support them.

GE Aerospace reported an installed base of approximately 44,000 commercial engines and 26,000 military and defense engines at launch. Its announcement put 2023 adjusted revenue at roughly $32 billion, with services accounting for 70 percent. The adjusted-revenue label matters: that figure was a company-defined financial measure, not a count of engines produced or a forecast of future sales.

The service share also explains why describing Aerospace simply as an engine manufacturer is incomplete. Equipment already in use creates demand for parts, maintenance and technical support. The business combines deliveries of new engines with work associated with keeping existing ones operating.

Vernova's industrial scope extended across three segments. Power covered gas, steam, hydro and nuclear technologies. Wind included onshore and offshore turbines and LM Wind Power. Electrification encompassed grid equipment, power conversion, solar and storage solutions, and software for electricity systems.

The result was an energy-equipment company whose work crossed generation and the infrastructure needed to move and manage electricity. A utility expanding a power station and a network operator improving transmission could both encounter Vernova, even though their projects required different machinery and capabilities.

Vernova reported more than 7,000 gas turbines and approximately 55,000 wind turbines in its installed base at separation. Its March investor presentation showed how strongly some of that equipment was connected to service work: Power had approximately $73 billion in year-end 2023 backlog, of which 81 percent represented services.

Backlog is not the same as annual revenue. The presentation defined it on a remaining-performance-obligation basis, recording contracted work still to be delivered. Its service weighting showed why the company's responsibilities extended far beyond finishing new equipment and shipping it out of a factory.

The separation put these different industrial portfolios under independent corporate leadership and financial reporting. It did not establish that engines would immediately become more reliable, turbine deliveries would accelerate or factory productivity would improve. Those outcomes still depended on execution within the businesses.

April 2 therefore changed the corporate structure around a large body of continuing industrial work. Airlines and power-system operators still required dependable machinery, replacement parts and technical support. The split made the two companies' areas of responsibility clearer, while their installed fleets ensured that much of the work would concern equipment built long before independence.

## Sources

- [GE Aerospace Launches as Independent, Investment-Grade Public Company Following Completion of GE Vernova Spin-Off](https://www.geaerospace.com/news/press-releases/ge-aerospace-launches-independent-investment-grade-public-company-following-0?ref=pvweekly.com) — GE Aerospace · 2024-04-02.
- [GE Vernova Completes Spin-off](https://www.gevernova.com/news/articles/ge-vernova-completes-spin?ref=pvweekly.com) — GE Vernova · 2024-04-02.
- [2024 Investor Day presentation](https://www.gevernova.com/sites/default/files/24%5Finvestor%5Fday%5Fpresentation%5Fgevernova.pdf?ref=pvweekly.com) — GE Vernova · 2024-03-06.